North America

March 17, 2014

Despite Poor Results, Globe University Focuses On “Selling Education”

In July of 2012, after a two-year investigation, the Senate HELP Committee released a scathing report on the for-profit college industry. The investigation found that many of these schools charge a much higher tuition, have lower graduation rates, saddle more students in debt, and often have higher student loan default rates than at traditional colleges. The Senate report also revealed that for-profit colleges often employ large numbers of recruiters with sales experience that are forced to meet enrollment quotas to keep their jobs.

Though none of the Globe Education Network schools were examined in the HELP committee report, Globe schools have engaged in similar predatory and unethical behavior, valuing profit over the students the school is supposed to be serving. Much like with the schools in the report, Globe executives focus on enrolling as many students as possible. To do this, large numbers of sales employees are employed as “admissions representatives,” who are subject to a high-stress, boiler room atmosphere, and focused on enrollment quotas. The more students enrolled, means the more money flowing to the schools to cover their inflated tuition prices.

As detailed in this Globe University director of admissions job posting, employees have to meet specific enrollment quotas, make a certain amount of phone calls to prospective students, and use a canned PowerPoint presentation when meeting with prospective students.

I recently spoke with several former Globe University employees who reiterated that there is intense pressure from executives to enroll as many students as possible. One former admissions representative, who wishes to remain anonymous, was in attendance at Globe University’s “Admissions Fall Kickoff Event” in 2012. Along with between 150 and 200 other admissions representatives, this employee attended a speech aimed at motivating Globe University admissions representatives. According to the employee, after the speech, the owner of Globe University and Minnesota School of Business, Terry Myhre grabbed the microphone and yelled to the audience, “Sell! Sell! Sell!” This, of course seems to conflict with what Globe executives claim, that “the sole reason our schools exist is to educate, graduate, and help the students we serve improve their careers.”

Poor Results

Another area where Globe schools parallel schools from the report, is with their high cost and poor results. For instance, students that do graduate, graduate with much higher average student debt than the national average. As shown in the graph below, the graduation rates at Broadview University, Minnesota School of Business, and Globe University are far below the national average.

From Silk.co

Data from globe.silk.co

At Globe University, 96% of students take out student loans and graduate with an average of $44,824 in student debt.  At Minnesota School of Business, another Globe Education Network school, the results are almost identical where 92% of students take out student loans and graduate with an average of $45,244 in student debt.  More easy to understand Silk Site graphs and charts detailing the Globe Education Network schools’ abysmal graduation rates, student loan cohort default rate, and more can be found at Globe.Silk.co.

Claims Against Globe University

This past fall, Globe University/ Minnesota School of Business was ordered to pay nearly $400,000 to former dean, Heidi Weber in a whistleblower lawsuit. Last month, the school was also ordered to pay an additional $500,000 in attorney fees to Weber and Globe’s motion for a new trial was denied.

Many of Weber’s claims uncovered a culture fostered by Globe executives that seems to place more importance on profit, rather than educating, graduating, and improving the lives of the students they serve. Weber blew the whistle on unethical behavior such as questionable advertising, violations of Title IV federal aid programs, bribing of students with free textbooks to keep them quiet, misrepresenting the school’s accreditation status to the public, and violations of recruiting methods and the ban on commissions for admissions representatives based on enrollment numbers.

This is not the only legal trouble Globe has faced. Other claims include:

Globe Education Network’s Admission Representative Training Manual

One of the documents that was made public after the trial is the Globe Education Network’s Admission Representative Training Manual, which I have uploaded at StudentDebtCrisis.org/Globe. Information in the training manual only strengthens claims that executives at these schools place a greater importance on profit, rather than the students.

The manual focuses heavily on the huge profits that can be made by “selling education,” whilst educating, graduating, and helping improve the careers of the students Globe serves takes a far back seat. New representatives begin by taking a four week-long training program covering “qualitative” sales philosophy, memorizing a 60-75 minute admissions presentation, learning how to “overcome objections” from prospective students, learning to close sales (enroll students), and the psychology of convincing prospective students to enroll. According to the manual, “The most successful representative is a psychologist first, a salesperson second.

 According to the training manual, the “CONTENTS OF A GOOD PRESENTATION” include the following:

1.) It must catch the prospect’s instant and undivided ATTENTION by aiming at his/her self-interest by promising them a benefit, appealing to their curiosity, or rendering a service.

2.) It must AROUSE HIS/HER INTEREST by describing benefits and pointing out the advantages of them.

3.) It must STIMULATE HIS/HER DESIRE for the benefits, and their advantages by offering factual proof and evidence.

4.) It must MOTIVATE HIM to take action to ENROLL.

Representatives are taught to use the “Questioning Technique” when selling a Globe education. While showing prospective students the presentation, representatives are instructed to “get continuous agreement by asking questions.

The theory here is the more the prospective student is in agreement throughout your presentation, the easier it will be to close. We call these types of questions “trial closes.” A trial close is asking for an opinion. The difference between a close and a trial close is asking for a decision, and asking for an opinion.

According to former Globe University admissions representative, Hannah Von Bank, admissions representatives are trained to use emotionally manipulative language when recruiting students, and to “find their pain.” In an affidavit submitted by Von Bank, she says that admissions representatives are instructed to sign up prospective students for financial aid as quickly as possible so the prospective student does not have time to think it over.

When ‘closing a sale’ representatives are taught to use a series of ‘trial closes.’ These, according to the manual are designed to help eliminate any objections and enhance the representative’s chances of enrolling the prospective student. Representatives are also taught to find problems a prospective student may have, and use education as the solution to that problem.

You are a PROBLEM SOLVER. You are there to help them overcome their problem. One problem is that they need specialized training. You are there to help them. If you do not think they have a problem, UNCOVER ONE and help them solve it. One point to remember – there are no arguments against education.

Executives at the Globe Education Network have been downplaying the negative news surrounding their schools. They claim that “the sole reason our schools exist is to educate, graduate, and help the students we serve improve their careers.” However, it is becoming more and more apparent that prospective students are merely viewed as dollar signs and an opportunity to “Sell! Sell! Sell!”



About the Author

Kyle McCarthy
Kyle McCarthy is co-founder of the nonprofit, StudentDebtCrisis.org and is a fellow of The Backbone Campaign. For his higher education advocacy, Kyle was recently listed as one of "10 leaders fighting for student loan reform" in the United States. In addition to his work on higher education, Kyle assists small companies and nonprofits with their marketing campaigns. He received his B.S. from Mount Saint Mary's University and his M.A. from the University of San Francisco.




2 Comments


  1. Student loan fraud was a problem back in 1990. The problem with the abuse is getting worse. Just look at Keiser College who also operates under the name Southeastern College. He goes into poor neighborhoods fills up his schools with low income people to get the full pell grant and then puts all of them in debt to the tune of about $30,000 each. He then buys up office buildings with that government money. Abuse and fruad still running rampant.


  2. […] This also appeared in Huffington Post and International Political Forum.  […]



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *